Last week Business Week ran a story on crowdsourcing that should be required reading for anyone following the phenomenon closely. Earlier this month Getty Images, the behemoth of the stock photography industry and the owner of iStockPhoto, announced it would begin licensing photos found on Flickr.com. Now this is significant news in and of itself. It's crowdsourced photography taken to its logical conclusion. With iStock, the contributors might be amateurs (and some 96 percent of them are), but they are shooting images with the market in mind. When Getty licenses an image from Flickr, they are effectively dipping straight into that seemingly bottomless well of our visual collective conscious. (For some specs on the deal, see Thomas Hawk.)
While last week's Bizweek story used the Flickr deal as a peg, the writer, John Tozzi, used it as a platform to explore a much more important issue: The extent to which crowdsourcing is hurting professional designers. This year at least three companies—99designs, crowdSPRING, and Pixish—that allow people to shop out design gigs to the lowest bidder have emerged. (Update: crowdSPRING employs a different model. Clients post a creative brief and the amount they're willing to pay; if the price is right, designers submit ideas in response. See Angeline's comment, below, for more detail.) Professional designers, like professional photographers before them, have reacted with understandable consternation. When Derek Powazek (the founder of the excellent JPG Magazine, and as such a pioneer in community-based photography projects)
launched Pixish, his boards were inundated with outraged designers. From Tozzi's Bizweek piece:
Powazek says that within days of the site's launch in February, posters on blogs and forums said Pixish would "destroy the design industry." He has little sympathy for his critics: "If a three-day-old site can destroy the graphic design industry, then it deserves to be destroyed," he says. But to placate them, he posted an extended response on the site and banned logo designs from the permitted assignments.
Powazek argues that the people posting jobs on his site, who generally offer rewards of $100 or less, aren't the same customers that use graphic design shops. Sites like Pixish give talented hobbyists ways to build their portfolios and get exposure, he adds. Professionals scapegoat microstock sites and crowdsourced design services instead of examining why their own businesses are struggling, Powazek contends. "This isn't Flickr's fault. It's yours," he adds.
The experience of stock photography would argue otherwise. While iStockPhoto and the other microstock sites have unquestionably opened up new markets, they've also taken over old ones at the expense of many professionals. Which brings me to the question of the day:
Will professional Graphic Designers see its revenues erode as a result of crowdsourcing?
Update: Tony adds these links in the comments below, but I wanted to bring them up into the post proper because the forum threads therein are as substantive and edifying as they are contentious. http://www.springwise.com/style_design/more_crowdsourced_graphic_desi/ http://andrewhyde.net/spec-work-is-evil-why-i-hate-crowdspring/


good idea. Thanks
Posted by: youtube | August 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM
Thank You..
Posted by: sohbet | August 16, 2009 at 02:25 AM
Thank You Admin
Posted by: sohbet | August 16, 2009 at 02:26 AM
tnkss
Posted by: Toker | August 18, 2009 at 01:35 AM
thankss
Posted by: gay sohbet | August 20, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Those people underestimated the determination of Yahoo!’s incredible people, spirit and culture.
Posted by: cinsiyet belirleme | August 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM
I have listed only blogs whose primary focus is climate
Posted by: bitki derman | August 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM
thanks.
Posted by: SOhbet,Chat,Mirc | September 10, 2009 at 07:38 AM
Thanks all.
Posted by: sohbet | September 18, 2009 at 09:58 AM
Thank you..
Posted by: komik videolar | October 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM
thanks admin.
I love you...
Posted by: Sohbet | October 20, 2009 at 07:02 PM
Thank you..
Posted by: Video Seyret | October 25, 2009 at 09:42 AM
Thanks a lot..
Posted by: videolar | October 26, 2009 at 06:35 PM
Yes good information...
Posted by: videolar | October 31, 2009 at 12:26 PM
thanks admin
Posted by: gay sohbet | November 01, 2009 at 03:09 PM
Good information...
Posted by: videolar | November 06, 2009 at 08:12 AM
thanks a lot
Posted by: cinsel sohbet | November 10, 2009 at 12:55 PM
thanks a lot
Posted by: cinsel sohbet | November 10, 2009 at 12:56 PM
thanksss
Posted by: video izle | November 12, 2009 at 10:47 AM
The question I have about photography and the "Golden Mean" is this...Do photographers conciously look for these patterns, or are they just taking pretty shots?
Posted by: muzikdinle | November 17, 2009 at 06:10 AM
teşekkürler
Posted by: cinsel sohbet | November 17, 2009 at 11:21 AM
The question I have about photography and the "Golden Mean" is this...Do photographers conciously look for these patterns, or are they just taking pretty shots?
Posted by: matbaa | November 18, 2009 at 05:40 AM
The question I have about photography and the "Golden Mean" is this...Do photographers conciously look for these patterns, or are they just taking pretty shots?
Posted by: ilahin | November 22, 2009 at 07:22 AM
The question I have about photography and the "Golden
Posted by: haber | November 23, 2009 at 02:55 AM
The question I have about photography and the "Golden Mean" is this...Do photographers conciously look for these patterns, or are they just taking pretty shots?
Posted by: oyun | November 23, 2009 at 06:15 AM