Late last week I pointed to a Wikipedia entry as evidence that crowdsourcing had become a bonafide neologism. A stronger argument for the term's adoption, however, is that the it's starting to appear without reference to me or the original article in Wired. I couldn't be happier with this development, but I'm also noticing that the word is being used somewhat interchangably with Yochai Benkler's concept of commons-based peer production. Mindful that language is slippery, and meaning itself largely determined by the crowd, I'm content to allow the crowd define the term for itself (in no small part because I'm powerless to stop it.) But I would be remiss if I did not play my own role in that process.
Bruce Sterling, a fellow writer at Wired and one of the biggest brains in the business, rightfully pointed out yesterday that it's a mistake to treat crowdsourcing as a synonym for peer production:
I could spend all day trying to explain how Jeff Howe's "crowdsourcing" has a different structure than "commons-based peer production." This would be no mere academic hairsplitting, either. You see, it's like mapping the mountains and finding two seams of gold. In one, a bunch of hairy-bearded *NIX prospectors are standing hip-deep in the water panning for lumps of gold, while in the other, Three Initial Corporation is data-mining vast spoilage heaps of almost-useless rubble.... I could go on. Others most certainly will.
And indeed, there's no hair-splitting about it. But before I present my definition of the term, I'd like to provide some backstory and context. In January Wired asked me to give a sort of "reporter's notebook" style presentation to some executives. I had recently been looking into common threads behind the ways advertising agencies, TV networks and newspapers were leveraging user-generated content, and picked that for my topic. Later that day I called my editor at Wired, Mark Robinson, and told him I thought there was a broader story that other journalists were missing, ie, that users weren't just making dumb-pet-trick movies, but were poised to contribute in significant and measurable ways in a disparate array of industries. Mark and I agreed that while the fact of peer production itself was becoming well-documented (witness Wired's early, and astute, take on the phenomenon, by Wired editor Thomas Goetz), no one we were aware of had documented the ways in which corporations were employing intelligent networks to put peer production to work. Our emphasis all along was on the verb, not the noun, a telling and revealing distinction.
Thus the term crowdsourcing (a term, for the record, coined jointly by Mark and myself that day, in a fit of back-and-forth wordplay). Simply defined, crowdsourcing represents the act of a company or institution taking a function once performed by employees and outsourcing it to an undefined (and generally large) network of people in the form of an open call. This can take the form of peer-production (when the job is performed collaboratively), but is also often undertaken by sole individuals. The crucial prerequisite is the use of the open call format and the large network of potential laborers.
For the purposes of the article, we set even stricter parameters: We decided we would only look at case studies involving big established companies (like Getty, Viacom and P&G). For the purposes of the blog, I advocate a slightly more inclusive definition. I interpret crowdsourcing to be taking place any time a company makes a choice to employ the crowd to perform labor that could alternatively be performed by an assigned group of employees or contractors, even if the company is just now putting up a shingle. In other words, crowdsourcing need not require an active shift from current employees (or again, contractors) to the crowd; it can start with the crowd.
Finally, a note on provenance: As has been rightfully pointed out, Crowdsourcing owes a debt to James Surowiecki's eye-opening and entertaining book, The Wisdom of Crowds. But as Suowiecki himself notes in that book, we both owe a further debt to Charles Mackay's Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, a work from the early Victorian era that should be required reading for anyone interested in the subject.


A good and comprehensive article. I am a more informed man after reading it!! Thanks.
Posted by: Hydrocodone no prescription | June 16, 2010 at 02:58 AM
TV networks and newspapers were leveraging user-generated content,and picked that for my topic. Later that day I called my editor at Wired, Mark Robinson,and told him I thought there was a broader story that other journalists were missing in the blog to share which is best.
Posted by: weight loss pills | July 19, 2010 at 04:18 AM
Interesting take on crowd sourcing.
Posted by: reverse lookup | July 19, 2010 at 12:59 PM
Nice definition. Crowdsourcing represents the act of a company or institution taking a function once performed by employees and outsourcing it to an undefined (and generally large) network of people in the form of an open call.
Ben Cliff
Posted by: Reservations call center | July 20, 2010 at 07:51 AM
TV networks and newspapers were leveraging user-generated content,and picked that for my topic.Later that day I called my editor at Wired, Mark Robinson,and told him to do so and share lot of information.
Posted by: weight loss pills | July 22, 2010 at 12:21 AM
TV networks and newspapers were leveraging user-generated content,and picked that for my topic. Later that day I called my editor at Wired, Mark Robinson,and told him I thought there was a broader story that other journalists were missing in the blog to share which is best.
Posted by: Louis Vuitton Outlet | July 22, 2010 at 07:49 AM
hi ... I really am very grateful for any information that you shared with readers, to me seemed a very interesting and I love to get much more information.
Posted by: Real Estate Investment costa rica | July 30, 2010 at 06:08 PM
Youngman Richardson is New Zealand based manufacturer and distributor of high quality industrial equipment, construction equipment and heavy machinery. Best backup service in the business since 1981.
Posted by: Industrial Equipment | July 31, 2010 at 03:00 AM
Some unseen fingers, like an idle breeze, are playing upon my heart the music of the ripples. Do you understand?
Posted by: air jordans | August 07, 2010 at 12:30 AM
your post has amazing PR, and despite it's nofollow, I think it's still good for links.
THanks!
Posted by: vigrx plus | August 19, 2010 at 06:52 AM
Your opinion is very unique! Very own set! Rarely see such an article! I think you would probably a lot of thought in it now! I appreciate your talent
Posted by: Puma Clyde | August 20, 2010 at 12:20 AM
Thank you for the introduction to the new outsourcing concept that you have defined as crowdsourcing – interesting approach
Posted by: NFL Jerseys | August 25, 2010 at 09:17 PM
Favog, I made a similar resolution, but it's to drink less beer. So far so good, though I'm not losing the weight I might if I gave it up entirely...What is it about religious celerations and torturing chickens? There's that Jewish thing up here where they do pretty much the same thing. Does God really like that??
Posted by: viagra online | August 26, 2010 at 11:16 AM